Comparison

Trainwork vs buying ChatGPT and training people yourself

This is the real alternative most companies pick, so it belongs on this page. Buy the tool, gather everyone for an hour, and hope it sticks. It is not a competitor to Trainwork in the normal sense, because you still need the tool either way: ChatGPT Business is the software, Trainwork is whether your people get good at using it. The comparison is only about the training half, and the honest finding is that the do-it-yourself version is cheap, fast, and usually does not survive month two.

A seat of ChatGPT Business for each person, plus internal training you create and deliver yourself: typically one session, some slides, a shared document of prompts, and a channel where people ask each other questions.

Price: ChatGPT Business Standard seats are $25 per user per month billed monthly, or $20 per user per month billed annually, from two users up. Premium seats are $125 monthly or $100 annually. The training half costs whatever your own time is worth, which is the part nobody budgets. Source, checked 2026-10-05. List prices change and are negotiated down at volume, so treat this as a starting point rather than a quote.


 ChatGPT Business and a lunch and learnTrainwork
What you pay$20 to $25 per person per month, forever, for the tool$99 per person, once, on top of whatever tool you use
Are they alternativesNo. This is the toolNo. This is the training. You need both
Who builds the trainingYou, from scratch, onceBuilt, and it adapts to each person's job
What the session isOne hour, everyone at once, generic examples45 short coached conversations on their own tasks
What happens in month twoWhatever people remember, and the keenest person becomes supportThey are still working through reps, and the dashboard shows who is not
Evidence anyone improvedNone, unless you build itPractice recorded per skill, plus a certificate
Cost of your timePreparing and running it, then answering questions foreverA company code, and you are out of the loop

These are real. If one of them describes you, buy theirs. We would rather lose the sale than have you find this out after paying us.

  • You have somebody internally who is genuinely good at this and enjoys teaching it. An enthusiastic in-house expert beats any product, and if you have one, use them.
  • Your team is small enough to learn by watching each other, which for three or four people is often true.
  • You only need the tool. If nobody needs to get better, buy seats and stop reading.
  • You want to see whether anyone uses it at all before spending anything on training.

  • You have already run the lunch and learn and nothing changed. This is the most common reason people arrive here.
  • Nobody internally has time to own this, and the keenest person has quietly become everyone's help desk.
  • You need to show someone that the money produced a result, which a one-off session cannot.
  • The gap is uneven: two people are flying, six are pretending. A session pitched at the room helps neither.

Do we still need ChatGPT if we buy Trainwork?

Yes. Trainwork is training, not an AI tool, and we are not trying to replace the thing your team works in. Practice happens here, the work happens there, and the coach hands each finished piece over to the real tool at the end of every conversation.

Is a lunch and learn actually worse?

It is better than nothing and it is the right first move. What it does not do is survive. People change a habit by practising it on their own work several times, not by watching someone demonstrate it once, and an hour cannot give twenty people practice. That is the whole difference, and it is why there is a difference between watching and learning.

Can we do both?

That is the best version. Run the session to create the appetite, then give people somewhere to actually practise. The session costs you an hour and makes the licences land better.


Trainwork is 15 skills at three coached conversations each, 45 in total, on your team's own work. See everything it teaches or why it is built as practice.

Last reviewed . Every figure on this site links to its source.